9/11 - Act of Treason
Mazzucco introduces his video, “9/11 – TAKE THE QUIZ”, with the oft-cited official story: “19 Islamic hijackers armed with box-cutters take over four passenger planes flying in the American skies. Two of these planes are crushed against the Twin Towers in New York, the third plane hits the Pentagon, and a fourth one is crashed intentionally by the passengers in an open field in Pennsylvania. The Twin Towers later collapse due to structural failures caused by the impacts and the ensuing fires, killing some 3,000 people.
This is, by-and-large, the official version of the events of 9/11, as told every year by the mainstream media all around the world.”
He then asks: “But how much do you really know about what truly happened on September 11th? And I’m not talking conspiracy theories here. I’m talking about simple, verifiable facts that somehow seem to have gone unnoticed in the big narrative maelstrom that has been 9/11 ever since.”
“My mourning for the country I live in is not abstract, but real and very immediate. Since the unsolved crime of 9/11/01, I have seen our republic descend into darkness, as we used the lie of 9/11 to justify aggression abroad and repression at home. We have officially become a torture state. Accountability for egregious crimes at the highest levels is non-existent.”
“September 11, 2001 seems destined to be the watershed event of our lives and the greatest test for our democracy in our lifetimes. The evidence of government complicity in the lead-up to the events, the failure to respond during the event, and the astounding lack of any meaningful investigation afterwards, as well as the ignoring of evidence turned up by others that renders the official explanation impossible, may signal the end of the American experiment. It has been used to justify all manner of measures to legalize repression at home and as a pretext for behaving as an aggressive empire abroad. Until we demand an independent, honest, and thorough investigation and accountability for those whose action and inaction led to those events and the cover-up, our republic and our Constitution remain in the gravest danger.”
Over 3,000 Engineers and Scientists have now called for a new investigation of 9/11 attacks! People demanding a real investigation, as the 9/11 Commission Report was a fraud!
Like most, I had beliefs in childhood that changed as I learned new information, such as my belief in the Tooth Fairy and Santa. But my steadfast belief in America, which I thought was synonymous with truth and justice, endured. When 9/11 happened, I felt justified in the awesome fury of retaliation against those who were blamed, because I believed what we were told. Having received virtually all my information from television and newspapers, I never once questioned the official version for years. After all, not only did I watch the towers fall live on the television, but the information from the experts that very day as to who did it fit perfectly with my core beliefs about America. Later, the scientific explanations as to how those towers fell came from respected sources that I also trusted, such as the National Geographic, and the PBS NOVA program. Their explanation of a natural fire induced collapse fit nicely with my still intact core beliefs about America. But those beliefs were shaken years later when I received a short video that focused on details of the collapse that were overlooked by my trusted sources. Suddenly, something snapped. Those towers didn’t just “fall down” by gravity alone; those towers were blown up! How could I have been so gullible for so many years? Why didn’t I know about these details, such as the eutectic mixtures, the freefall of building 7, the missing jolt, the iron microspheres and the nanothermite? Any one of them, let alone all, point directly to an intentional demolition rather than a fire-induced natural gravitational “collapse.” Well it just wasn’t right, and I had to tell others. I now believed that once people were aware of this evidence they would rise up collectively and demand justice. My, how naïve my new belief was! Much to my surprise, rather than provoke interest or outrage, what I mostly got was silence, doubt, or ridicule. I was about as popular as the one that told you that Santa doesn’t really exist. I began to realize what a firm grip our belief systems have on us, and how loath we are to having those beliefs challenged. For many, it seems far more important to preserve a lifetime of beliefs about one’s country, religious or political views than to peek into any details that go against them. Even in my engineering world, I found it’s ok to study the scientific details of how a bridge or building falls just as long as that building didn’t fall on September 11. There seems to be a deep “disconnect” between what the average person believes and what the evidence says must be true.
Having gone through a demanding 5 year Science Engineering program at Northwestern University, I knew, from day one on September 11,2001, that it had been an impossibility for the towers to have collapse absent explosive demolition. In a hundred years it had never happened before, yet 3 steel frame high rise towers all collapsed on the same day and none ever since. Only slowly did I start to learn of others who had problems with our government's conspiracy story and were doing their own amazing research. Families' of the victims literally had to publicly shame the government into conducting an actual investigation. In 2005, the 9/11 Commission Report was finally released. I was shocked at how it ignored all the evidence uncovered by researchers , refused to answer questions of the families and yet still provided NO evidence of its own to support its conspiracy theory. To me, the 9/11 Commission Report was a confession that 9/11 had actually been an inside job organized, managed and covered up by my government. But to be more precise, 9/11 was done by the Deep State that has seized near total control of my government, its elected officials, legal system and mainstream media. Since 2005, I have offered a $100,000.00 reward to the first person who can demonstrate otherwise. I have had no takers. People who continue to believe the government's 9/11 fairytale conspiracy theory need to put up or accept the horrid truth about our government. The movie "Operation Terror" banned from Corporate Movie Theaters is an accurate depiction of the 9/11 events based on known evidence.
Now, an irrefutable fact: WTC 1, 2 and 7 Buildings Collapsed due to Demolition, Not Fire. Thanks to the detailed research of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and the University of Alaska Fairbanks’ (UAF) four-year computer modeling study of WTC 7’s collapse, it has been scientifically and engineer-wise demonstrated that the collapses on 9-11 of WTC 1, WTC 2 and WTC 7 were not caused by fire (or plane crashes), but rather by the near-simultaneous failure of every column in the buildings! In other words, the collapses were caused by demolition using highly precision timed explosives! (Note: No steel frame building has ever collapsed due to fire in over 100 years. To say that 3 buildings did so on 9/11 has long been beyond belief!)
Over 300 Firefighters died on 9/11. Honor them with the truth!
We are firefighting professionals, current and retired, as well experts in the study of the 9/11 incidents and the various post-incident governmental and private investigations. Our motto has long been “Never Forget, Never Again.” However, we choose to honor our fallen Firefighter brothers with a commitment to properly examine ALL the evidence and let it take us to the truth of what really happened on that terrible day, so that when we “Never Forget”, we remember what actually happened, and can therefore genuinely work towards a real possibility of “Never Again”. We see 9/11 truth as a ‘Peace Movement’, a chance to prevent past mistakes, such as the many “Wars on Terror” which have been predicated upon false information and contrived consent. Truth must form the cornerstone of any good society or proper democracy. Without truthful information, proper choice is impossible and democracy becomes an illusion. Our intention is to create a compassionate community that respects truth and civil discourse so that we may all learn, gain a genuine and deeper understanding and hopefully increase the potential for a better future for all.
The Journal of 9/11 Studies is a peer-reviewed, electronic-only journal covering research related to the events of September 11, 2001. Many fields of study are represented and all content is freely available online. Since 2006, the Journal has presented some of the most compelling analysis and evidence related to the crimes of September 11, 2001. Today our mission is to offer new findings and new, evidence-based perspectives that have not yet been addressed. We hope you find the content informative and useful in the fight for truth, justice and peace.
A 9/11 investigation was resisted by the White House  and was only granted under pressure from the surviving families nearly two years after the event. The 9/11 Commission was a low-budget affair (costing a fraction of the Monica Lewinsky investigation) and tightly controlled by a White House insider, Philip Zelikow.  Co-Chair Lee Hamilton said the 9/11 Commission was “set up to fail,” and Former commissioner Max Cleland resigned, calling it a “national scandal.” 
The 9/11 Commission Report ignored dozens of facts,  including the sudden, straight-down collapse at 5:21 PM of World Trade Center 7, a 47-story steel-framed building that was two blocks from the Twin Towers and was not hit by an airplane.
The 9/11 Commission Report , which is incomplete and lacks peer review, can hardly be viewed as an evidence-based study.
The other central documents in the official account were prepared over a seven-year period by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), in an attempt to explain the strange vertical, nearly free-fall collapses of the Twin Towers and Building 7.  There was no consideration given to a controlled demolition hypothesis, although the attending firefighters and TV anchors (including CBS anchor Dan Rather and ABC anchor Peter Jennings  suggested the uncanny similarity at the time.
Like The 9/11 Commission Report, the NIST reports were not peer-reviewed. Sixty days were given for public comment on the first draft, but the comments, and many serious concerns that were raised, were almost entirely ignored in writing the final report.